Page 19 - Swatantrata to Atmanirbharta : Lokmanya Tilak’s legacy
P. 19

to writing petitions or seeking audience with, and appeal to, the
            Viceroy  and the  British  Government.  An  Englishman, A.  O.
            Hume was one of the founders of Indian National Congress and
            the colonial administration was looking at it as a safety-valve
            for popular unrest. Tilak gave the politics its first set of teeth,
            through his  scathing editorials, against various governmental
            policies, in his papers, KESARI and MARATHA.
               In the  case of obtaining  concessions  from the  colonial
            government too, Lokmanya Tilak’s role of a bridge, stands out.
            He first formed the “Home Rule league” with Annie Beasant
            and then ratcheted it up to his famous roar, “SWARAJYA is my
            birth-right and I shall have it.”
               He can be credited to cross the geographical divide too. Before
            him, the political leaders of various regions of the country, like
            Maharashtra, Bengal and Punjab used to have few interactions
            among themselves. Tilak had excellent personal relations with
            the Punjab-Kesari, Lala Lajpat Rai and Bipin Chandra Pal of
            Bengal. Lal,  Bal, and Pal are the  famous  three-some  of our
            Independence struggle.
               Lokmanya Tilak  passed  away  at  the  age  of 61.  It  will  be
            interesting to see what would have happened to Indian politics
            if GOD had been kind enough to extend Tilak’s life by twenty
            years. The public space would not have become a sole preserve
            of Gandhiji, but the Lokmanya would have acknowledged the
            connect  of the  Mahatma,  with  the  masses  and would  have
            drawn  him  to  the  cause of social upliftment,  education  and
            so on. He would have worked as a bridge between Gandhiji’s
            non-violence  and the  propagation  of armed struggle by  the
            revolutionaries and would have struck a middle ground. So, the
            likes of Chandra Shekhar Azad might have given up violence
            and Gandhiji would not have wounded up the non-co-operation
            movement after the Chauri-Chora incidence in February 1922.
            He would certainly have demanded amnesty for Bhagat Singh,
            Sukhdev and Rajguru  before  accepting  1931  proposal of the
            Viceroy, Lord Irwin.

               Tilak, being acknowledged as a custodian of Hindu interests,
            Pandit  Madan Mohan Malviya, Swami Shraddhanand  and

                                           17        Swatantrata  to  Atmanirbharata
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24