Page 118 - Abhivruddhi
P. 118

relevant for human welfare than GDP per capita. Even ignoring human
          development considerations, on purely marginalist grounds (the diamond
          water paradox) it can be argued that GDP is misleading.  Basically, GDP
          is based on exchange value or the  amount paid, not the use value or the
          total utility and the consumer surplus. This author himself has expressed
          the view that employment data are far more important than GDP data for
          macroeconomics aspects of welfare and are more timely too (Moorthy,
          2017, pg 176).

            A few months later, the renowned former RBI Governor Rangarajan
          strongly criticized the target.  In a speech at ICFAI Business School, he
          emphatically stated that the “..$5 trillion GDP target by 2025 is simply out
          of the question.”  His detailed statement was:
            Today our economy is about $ 2.7 trillion and we are talking about
          doubling this over the next five years at $ 5 trillion.  The required rate of
          growth to achieve that level is in excess of 9% per annum.  Reaching $ 5
          trillion by 2025 is simply out of the question…You have lost two years.
          This year it is going to be under 6% growth and next year it may be about
          7%.  (Business Today, 2019 )
            However,  according  to  us,  his  scepticism  can  be  questioned. His
          detailed statement seems to imply that he was criticizing a real GDP target
          while, as explained above, the IMF target was in NGDP terms.  While Dr.
          Rangarajan was certainly correct to assert that 9% real GDP growth is
          impossible, the $5trn. NGDP target implied much lower than 9% real
          GDP growth he had ascribed to it, as will be explained below.
            One cannot accurately assess a $NGDP target for India without first
          specifying Rs. values for real GDP, inflation and the exchange rate.  That
          is what his above cited statement seems to have done.
            Our assessment below will be based on such specifications.  Indeed, the
          logical way to go about assessing any $NGDP target is to start from the
          underlying projected real GDP growth and inflation, add them to get the
          ‘endogenous’ NGDP in rupees, and then convert that to $. This numerical
          exercise is done below with real time data as of mid 2019 to assess the $
          5 trillion target when it was announced.  By real time data is meant the
          data available at that point of time on the basis of which a given forecast
          or statement.   It is not the latest data that will pop up if downloaded from
          the website, which can be quite different and may mistakenly imply that
          the statement in question is wrong.


                                          118
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123