Page 277 - IMDR JOURNAL 2023-24
P. 277

IMDR’s Journal of Management Development & Research 2023-24


               on previously published works.

               It is possible to confirm all of these associations using a variety  of inferential statistics or
               approaches. These hypotheses may or may not be accepted depending on the effectiveness of

               regression  procedures.  According  to  the  goals  of  the  study,  the  following  hypothesis  was
               created for testing:

               H0-  There  is  no  association  between  age  and  customer  preference  for  ready-to-eat  food
               products.

               H1-  There  is  an  association  between  age  and  customer  preference  for  ready-to-eat  food

               products.
               Limitations of the Study

               Some limitations of my study are as follows:

               1)The study is confined to Jabalpur city only.
               2)Due to the time constraint 87 respondents were selected for the study.

               3)  Decisions  made  by  respondents  while  filling  out  the  questionnaire  may  have  been
               influenced  by  their  preconceptions,  and  preferences,  as  well  as  respondent  fatigue,  which

               may have affected the study's quality.


               Types of Data
               The researcher has used structured questionnaire for the collection of primary data for the

               collection of responses through the survey method. The nature of the study is quantitative

               research. It has been conducted with a methodology and primary data was considered.


               Data Analysis and Interpretation

                           AGE OF THE                PERCENTAGE               FREQUENCY
                            RESPONDENTS
                                14-17                    26.4%                      23
                                18-30                    52.9%                      46
                                31-45                     6.9%                      6
                             ABOVE 45                    13.8%                      12
                               TOTAL                      100%                      87


                                       TABLE 4.1: AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS









                                                                                                               269
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282