Page 251 - IMDR JOURNAL 2023-24

IMDR’s Journal of Management Development & Research 2023-24

This data highlights the prevalence of awareness regarding the Abilene Paradox within the surveyed
population. The substantial percentage of individuals who indicated their awareness suggests that this concept

is relatively well-known among the participants. However, it is noteworthy that a notable portion of the
population still lacks familiarity with the Abilene Paradox, as indicated by the 29.03% who responded in the

negative. These insights provide crucial information for understanding the extent of knowledge and awareness

of this concept within the surveyed group, which can be valuable for educational and decision-making
purposes, particularly in contexts where an understanding of the Abilene Paradox is essential for effective

group dynamics and decision-making.

Instances of Abilene Paradox:

Instances Abilene Paradox- Instances (%)

No 54.84%
Yes 45.16%

Grand Total 100.00%

The provided data sheds light on the occurrence of instances related to the Abilene Paradox within the surveyed

population. Respondents were categorized into two distinct groups based on their experiences: those who

responded with "No" and those who indicated "Yes" when asked whether they had observed instances of the
Abilene Paradox. The results reveal that a substantial proportion, accounting for 54.84% of the total

respondents, reported that they had not observed instances of the Abilene Paradox. In contrast, 45.16% of the

total respondents indicated that they had indeed observed instances of this paradox.

This data underscores the mixed nature of experiences regarding the Abilene Paradox within the surveyed

population. While a significant portion of respondents had not observed instances of the paradox, a notable
fraction, representing 45.16%, reported first-hand experiences. These findings are valuable for understanding

the prevalence and awareness of the Abilene Paradox among the surveyed group. They also provide insight
into the extent to which this phenomenon is encountered or recognized in various contexts, which can be

instrumental for research and decision-making in areas where group dynamics and consensus-building are

crucial.

243