Page 66 - Appreciating Organization's Biggest Assets
P. 66

mechanistic in nature operated in   Literature Review
       a stable environment and hence      According to Gregg et al. (2011),
       lesser  flexi-  bility  was  required  in   the size of company is directly
       executive’s competencies. Whereas   linked with the remuneration
       modern organizations which op-     of executives. Zhou, Yang and
       erate in an unstable environment   Li (2010), state that executive
       like information technology adopt   compensation is positively corre-
       organic oriented sys- tems. To handle   lated with company performance.
       these systems, higher flexibility and   Diminishing companies pay lower
       variety is needed as executive’s com-   than  flourishing  ones.  Yang  and
       petency. Therefore the executives in   Huang (2010), the top executives
       the latter organization are paid more   can improve the performance of
       than the former.                   the  firm  if  they  are  motivated  by

        Capacity   to   pay:  Executive   the  salary  offered.  Asafo-  Adjei
       compensation      is     directly  (2015), top executives take reckless
       proportional to the paying capacity  risks if the firm offers bonus driven
       of  the  firm.  And  paying  capacity  structures. However, Hough (2011)
       of  the  firm  is  directly  dependent  believes the opposite that these
       on the earning capacity. Hence,  bonus  driven  structures  help  in
       flourishing organizations pay more  attracting, rewarding, motivating,
       than declining organizations due to  and retaining experienced ex-
       high profit margins.               ecutives  for  the  firm’s  success.
        Organisational      philosophy:   Studies say that there is a positive
       Organizations who believe in       relationship between impacts of
       hiring the best in class execu- tives   executive incentives on corporate
       and retaining them pay higher to   performance. Gopalan and Gormley
       organizations who does not believe   (2013), when an exec- utive is not
       this. After liber- alization, many   paid justify able amount, it may
       multinationals entered India which   lead to agency costs as the executive
       paid high compensation. This       won’t be inter- ested or motivated to
       compelled Indian firms to level up   improve performance and profits of
       with the other MNC’s.              the company

        International           Impact:    Berle and Means (1932), Modern
       International  human     resource  firms are those where ownership and
       management practices have impact   management are sepa- rated. Agency
       on setting executive compensation   theory played a crucial role in the
       across many countries.             twentieth century in understanding
                                          the corpo- rate governance and

                                        66
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71